How long did this disaster recovery modernization take from kickoff to fully tested?

The engagement ran five months from initial discovery to the first passing quarterly restore drill across all tier-1 applications. Discovery and RPO/RTO sign-off took the first several weeks, since agreeing on the tier-1 list required input from both engineering and business stakeholders. The remaining time went into tooling consolidation, warm standby setup, and running the first live restore test to validate the new runbooks.

What if we're not using AWS Backup or Azure Site Recovery already — does this approach still apply?

Yes — the underlying discipline (agreed RPO/RTO per application, quarterly tested restores, alerting on failures, and role-separated access) is tooling-agnostic. AWS Backup, Azure Site Recovery, and Veeam were the right fit for this client's existing AWS/Azure mix, but the same standardization approach works with other cloud-native backup services or Veeam-only environments.

What was the biggest risk during the engagement?

The riskiest moment was the first live restore drill for revenue-critical services that had never been tested end to end, since a botched test could itself cause an outage. We mitigated this by running drills in isolated, Terraform-provisioned recovery environments that never touched production, so failures during testing had zero customer impact.

Does this level of rigor make sense for a smaller engineering team?

The core practices — a single tier-1 application list, quarterly restore tests, and automated failure alerting — scale down well and are arguably more urgent for smaller teams who can't absorb a botched recovery. The warm standby cross-region replication is the one piece worth reserving for genuinely revenue-critical workloads, since it adds ongoing infrastructure cost that smaller teams may not need everywhere.

Back to case studies

Enterprise SoftwareCloud InfrastructureSecurity & Compliance

Disaster Recovery & Backup Modernization

How a confidential enterprise software vendor replaced ad hoc, per-team backup habits with tested RPO/RTO targets, quarterly restore drills, and cross-region resilience for its tier-1 workloads. The engagement turned disaster recovery from a compliance checkbox into a measurable, owned operational discipline.

Tested recovery paths instead of shelf-ware plans

Client

Confidential — enterprise software

Industry

Enterprise Software

Timeline

5 months

Technologies

6+ tools

The Challenge

!Every product team had picked its own backup tooling over the years, so retention windows ranged from seven days to indefinite, encryption was applied inconsistently, and nobody could produce a single inventory of what was actually being protected. Auditors kept finding gaps between what documentation claimed and what backup jobs actually did.

!Restore drills simply did not happen on any regular cadence; the last full-scale test predated most of the current infrastructure team, so nobody could say with confidence how long a real recovery would take. Leadership had RTO numbers on slides that had never been validated against a live restore.

!Databases and object storage for several revenue-critical services lived entirely in one AWS region, with no replica, snapshot copy, or failover path anywhere else. A regional outage or account-level incident would have meant extended downtime with no tested alternative.

!Enterprise customers and the compliance team were pushing for evidence of backup immutability and strict access controls, but the existing tooling mix could not consistently produce that evidence, and some legacy jobs still allowed the same credentials to both write and delete backups.

!There was no accepted list of which applications were actually tier-1, so incident responders and engineering leadership disagreed in the moment about what deserved priority during a real outage, wasting critical minutes in past incidents.

!Backup job failures were discovered manually, sometimes weeks later, because no monitoring or alerting existed for missed or corrupted backup runs; a silent failure could persist through several backup cycles before anyone noticed.

!Dependency relationships between applications, databases, and shared services were undocumented, so even when a restore was attempted, engineers had to reconstruct the correct recovery order from memory and Slack history rather than a runbook.

!Different teams used different vendors — some on Veeam, some rolling their own scripts against cloud-native snapshot APIs — which meant no consistent reporting, no shared dashboard, and duplicated tooling spend across the organization.

Our Solution

We ran a structured discovery phase to catalogue every tier-1 application, mapping each to an agreed RPO and RTO signed off by both engineering and business stakeholders, along with a dependency graph showing upstream and downstream systems for correct recovery sequencing.

Backup policies were standardized across the estate: consistent retention windows by data classification, encryption at rest and in transit as a default rather than an exception, and immutability enabled wherever compliance or contractual obligations required it.

We consolidated tooling around AWS Backup and Azure Site Recovery for cloud-native workloads, layering in Veeam where legacy or hybrid systems needed it, and retired the redundant one-off scripts that had accumulated over several years.

Automated quarterly restore tests were built using Terraform and Ansible so that recovery environments could be spun up repeatably, exercised against real data, and torn down without manual toil, with pass/fail results captured for every run.

For the handful of data paths that genuinely could not tolerate an RTO measured in hours, we introduced warm standby replicas in a secondary region, keeping them continuously synced so failover became a controlled cutover rather than a from-scratch rebuild.

PagerDuty alerting was wired directly into backup job status, so a missed run, a checksum failure, or a job falling outside its compliance retention window triggers an immediate page rather than a quarterly surprise.

We built stakeholder-facing reporting that turned each restore drill into a documented artifact: measured recovery time, any deviations from target RTO, and a remediation item list, all shared with leadership and available to compliance auditors on request.

Access controls were tightened so backup write and delete permissions were separated by role, closing the gap where a single compromised credential could both create and destroy recovery points.

Measurable Impact

Restore drills

4x per year, on schedule

Recovery testing moved from an undocumented, ad hoc event to four scheduled quarterly exercises per year with tracked pass/fail outcomes.

RTO confidence

100% of tier-1 RTOs validated by live test

Every tier-1 application's stated recovery time is now backed by a timed live restore result rather than slide-deck estimates from years earlier.

Single points of failure

Reduced from 1 region to 2+ for all revenue-critical data

Warm standby and cross-region replication removed the single-region dependency for every revenue-critical database and object store previously exposed.

Compliance evidence

Evidence packs delivered in under 1 day

Retention, encryption, immutability, and access controls now map directly to control framework requirements, with exportable evidence packs generated in hours instead of the week-plus scramble auditors previously triggered.

Backup failure detection

Under 15 minutes

PagerDuty alerts on failed or non-compliant backup jobs fire within minutes, replacing a manual discovery process that previously took weeks.

Tooling footprint

Reduced from 4+ overlapping tools to 3 standardized platforms

Standardizing on AWS Backup, Azure Site Recovery, and Veeam eliminated redundant one-off scripts and duplicated vendor spend across teams.

“We finally treated recovery like a product feature. Drills were boring in the best way — predictable, measured, and owned. When an auditor asked for proof, we had it in minutes instead of scrambling for a week.”
I
Infrastructure director
Director of Infrastructure, enterprise software (NDA)

Technology stack

AWS BackupAzure Site RecoveryVeeamTerraformAnsiblePagerDuty